iconAll times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM. | Welcome to Forum, please register to access all of our features.

> Engi no Jutsu - The Best Naruto RP on the Net! > Role Playing Information > RPG General Discussion > Beast Master System Discussion

View Poll Results: What is up with Beast Masters?
They are too weak for the investment 9 75.00%
They are too confusing to play 0 0%
I've just never considered them 3 25.00%
I just don't like them 0 0%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2017, 03:22 AM   #11
New Vision
Simonsez's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,127

Maybe sorta, there should be an option to get one stronger pet or maybe two or three weaker animals (I was thinking of making a party animal archetype) that would allow some creativity in that aspect. You could also help scale stats with jutsu (gain this skill and your animal gets access to stage nin and now scale physically as a jounin, etc) the problem this runs into is what would the primary stat be? Mental? Or are we talking about the pets getting stats equal to the users own stars? Should it be said to just give them extra thread points? I'm just rambling
Simonsez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 03:33 AM   #12
Fusion Admin
merdle's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: northerly
Posts: 6,366

I think the full extent of what you've said would be on the nose the same as puppeteer, and it doesn't sound like that is what people want. They just want the pets to be stronger, have more options. Which in turn Jami has pointed out needs a heavier investment from the master.

Possibilities of something more in the middle:
- The pets have their own stats, but instead of taking a taijutsu they would get taijutsu bonuses from the Beast Master list.
- Techniques in the list would allow for additional sub-pets, or different types of pets (like a weak but equal flock).
- Techniques could give the pet access to different types of techniques, possibly techniques it otherwise wouldn't know, or special techs from the owner.
- Yeah probably mental.
merdle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 04:05 AM   #13
Mr. Hicks
Will RP For Meat
Mr. Hicks's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Behind Your Door
Posts: 2,209

Personally I like the Beastmaster List, it has decent utility and leaves enough room for swaps. No, I have three other issues with beasmaster.

1. The animal is just too weak at the start for lower rank characters. These animals have had just as much training as their owners and I feel it should show.

2. It seems like character growth is "one or the other", meaning the player is basically controlling two different characters but is only getting enough reward to make one grow. You shouldn't have to rob Peter to pay Paul.

3. Clan exclusivity on animals (may not exist anymore because I'm just kicking up old shit). I have nothing against the Inuzuka clan as a whole, they're a great clan. But insisting that only Inuzukas can use dogs when dogs are easily found, domesticated, and trained is a little unfair. A beastmaster should be allowed to use any animal it can get it's hands on and train, there will always be a clear, set difference between a beastmaster trained animal and a animal specific clan animal, so why enforce exclusivity?
I want you to take a good look at me and my work and accept that I am not a person with a plan.

Takeshi Sakuragi - Masked Grass Field Doctor
Koji Zansetsu - Hot-Blooded Cloud Field Mechanic
Hideyoshi Watanabe - Conniving Sand Hustler
Mr. Hicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2017, 07:01 AM   #14
in lame man terms
kyzuko's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Neverwhere, CA
Posts: 2,618

I like the proposed changes, though I just had to go check the beast master archetype when the nin-as-tai style list option came up to make sure that beastmaster was not, in fact, physical primary locked. But since PST is set to "any" for all three of those, that's not so much of an issue.

As for pet exclusivity for clans, it didn't really make sense that all dogs were supposed to be Inuzuka. It might make sense, however, if the clan has specifically bred a variety of dog/cat/eagle/other animal. Because, honestly, I like the idea of a beastmaster clan having an exclusivity on, say, giraffes or bison. But to extend the latter to an exclusivity on all cow-like animals would be a step too far. Example from my clan in the works: they have bred a specific variety of eagle. Anyone can have an eagle, but nobody outside the clan would have access to this specific variety of eagle. That kind of exclusivity is one thing, but "only we have dogs period" may be too far (but srsly, then you just go 'Fine, I got a wolf, gomd').

My question is: would beasts still be able to take jutsu?

"The more I see of what you call civilization,
the more highly I think of what you call savagery!"

Robert E. Howard, King Kull
||GM, Arechihana Bloodline Clan of Sand||
||Co-GM, Shoda Bloodline Clan of Cloud||
\\Shoda Hoshihana, Cloud Jounin//
//Arechihana Sasori, Spartoi\\
||Yotarou Ouji, SUNA chuunin||Koike Kano, ANBU||
||Hasami Kuma, the Iron Devil of Sound||Tsubasa Kinoshita, Rain Jounin||

kyzuko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2017, 06:52 PM   #15
Engi's Own Y2J
Masked_One's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,457

Unpopular opinion: As someone RP'ing with a genin beastmaster, I don't really see a problem with it right now. Maybe it's because my kid has a bird as a pet [as opposed to like a bear], but I never was under the impression that my pet should be as strong as my BM. The pet was more of a support tool to use in combat, in addition to the other techniques my shinobi actually had. It's not like my genin is super limited because he decided to become a BM, and his pet is the only way he becomes viable in combat. He's an average shinobi with techniques just like others, he just happened to take an archetype that allows him an extra companion to perform additional support in fights. That's a bonus enough, imo.

I will say only maxing at 1 TP kinda sucks, maybe they can get whatever rating their owner gets? That way they aren't ever as strong [unless the owner sacrifices all their points] but they don't become utterly useless either and kind of 'scale' along with their owner.

As far as exclusive animals go, I'm with Kyz.

Thank you Relu for the buttons!


~ Mist Secondary GM [ in training :P ] ~

Masked_One is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump